Meanwhile,
on the home front
by
David Grand
September 11, 2003
All
the way to Bombay! I almost hung-up the phone, thinking I
must've mis-dialed AOL's number, when the crisp voice I heard
on the other end sounded like that of an Englishman, and that
I'd be charged for an overseas call. But not so, for it turned
out my call had been transferred to his desk in Bombay, where
he was employed by AOL as a trouble-shooter. His English was
as flawless as it was precise as he quickly solved my problem.
Those 200 years the British ruled India paid-off at least
in that respect.
While
I was aware that hundreds of thousands of jobs here in America,
particularly in the manufacturing and textile industries,
have been lost by companies relying more and more on producing
their products (for cheaper labor costs) south of the border
and overseas, I didn't appreciate till now how widespread
that trend is.
Just
for fun, I checked the labels on some of my clothes and found:
that my "Route 66" denim shirt was made in Mexico
(that's some detour), and that its shorts came from Indonesia;
that my Haggar pants were from Mexico; that my "Izod"
shorts came from Egypt; that my rain jacket was from Sri Lanka;
and that my L.L. Bean raincoat was made in Taiwan, my jeans
and winter shirts in Mexico and my sheepskin slippers in China.
And oh yes, that's where the desk lamp came from I'm using
to illuminate the computer screen (if not my mind) in typing
this column.
No wonder
there's 9 million Americans unemployed, that there's a 6.2
unemployment rate, that 600,000 jobs have been lost since
February alone, that more than a half-million of the unemployed
have given up trying to find a job, and that our trade deficit
is 530 billion (close to the federal deficit).
And talk
about hitting American workers when they're down, the administration
has come up with a proposed federal regulation that would
end overtime eligibility for at least 8 million workers, in
order to help businesses cut labor costs. But it might not
happen, if Congress passes the amendment to the 2004 Labor-Health
and Human Services spending bill put forth by Sen. Tom Harkin,
D-Iowa that would stop the Labor Dept. from continuing work
on the proposal. As Harkin said, "hard work should be
rewarded, and this the most anti-family proposal I've seen
in my years in Congress."
Equally
disturbing is our rapidly deteriorating infrastructure. As
a report of the American Society of Civil Engineers said,
"the condition of 12 key categories of infrastructure
showed little or no improvement- and in many cases worsened-
in the past two years."
The report
cites as examples of that failure, "the congested roadways,
crumbling bridges, the poor condition of 75 percent of the
nation's school buildings, outdated drinking water systems,
and last month's massive blackout in the Northeast and Midwest
due to an over-burdened, electrical grid system." As
Rep. John Duncan, R-Tenn., said "the needs are immediate,
and that if we can spend a billion dollars a week to help
re-build Iraq, we should be doing as much for the people in
this country."
The Society
recommends an investment of $1.6 trillion over five years,
with $127 billion earmarked for building new schools and fixing
old ones; and that Congress increase the user fee on gasoline
by six cents to help pay for infrastructure projects. But
that might be so much wishful thinking, considering that the
federal budget deficit is now 550 billion (not including the
87 billion the president asked Congress for this week) and
that the deficit could reach well over 1.5 trillion just over
the horizon.
But the
biggest question mark is how long will taxpayers be willing
to pick-up the tab for the war on terrorism at the expense
of neglecting, or setting aside, urgently needed spending
for programs and projects on the home front, given the president's
resolve to pursue the war to the end, no matter the costs
or how many troops it takes.
By the
way, if you're curious as to what a billion is, it would take
you about 29 years, working 12 hours a day without stopping,
to count a billion dollars in one-dollar bills at the rate
of 127 a minute. But you'd undoubtedly quickly join the ranks
of the unemployed or go mad if you tried to.