An encore for the 'Fat Lady'
by
David Grand
April 15, 2004
Just like last year she sang the same melancholy song when Maryland's
legislators left Annapolis with their tails between their legs, the only
difference being that her encore sounded more like a gurgling water pipe and with
her high notes resembling a parrot's scream.
However, she might as well refrained from straining her vocal cords
reaching for the "high notes," for there were hardly any in this session, except
for providing funding for education, the Chesapeake Restoration plan, the
Transportation Trust Fund (only partially) and closing corporate tax loopholes.
And, oh yes, making lacrosse the state's team sport and the Patuxent River stone
the state gem.
But barring some unforeseen miracle to increase Maryland's revenues for
the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2005- projected to be $830 million short of
spending- I don't imagine she'd consent to make another stage appearance out
of sheer boredom in having to sing the same woeful song yet another time. What
a shame that'd be, for normally her voice is as sweet and rich as a
nightingale's on joyous occasions.
And I wonder how in the world a party could've been held in the Senate
office building on the last day of the session, with drinking and dancing
lasting into the early morning hours? What reason could the legislators possibly
have to celebrate, other than the ending of a grueling 90 days in the trenches?
But no one I'm sure dared to propose a toast to their time having been well
spent in earning their fat paychecks except in jest. Better that they "turned
into pumpkins" when the clock struck midnight officially ending that sorry
session and left to rot for once again "sticking" it to the counties, the
taxpayers and the near-moribund racing industry.
While that may sound hardhearted on my part, it's borne out of years of
frustration over all the jawboning and gamesmanship in Annapolis over whether
or not to join the surrounding states in reaping huge profits from slots, or
to stand idly by as countless millions are siphoned out of the state each
year. And with Charles Town slated to install 2,000 more slot machines, and the
Keystone State having approved placing slots at 12 racetracks, the hemorrhaging
will increase all the more.
Now, while I've always believed in having a balance of power between
the executive and legislative branches of the state's government, I'm now of the
mind that one-party control at least as pertains to Maryland is the only
proven way of getting important legislation passed with a minimum of "sound and
fury." I say that mainly because partisanship is at an all-time high in
Annapolis, much as it is in Washington. And that when the "chips are down," voting the
straight, party lines trumps any other considerations. A sad commentary
indeed on our two-party system of government. But it's as true as the sky is blue.
But I must say, that never before in my memory have I seen the
Democrats so united and bound and determined to undermine the plans of the first
Republican governor in the last 39 years, and that the very thought of having other
than one of their own sleeping and eating in the Governor's Mansion had them
ricocheting off the walls in revulsion. And shame on those Democrats for
marching in lockstep behind Busch, like the rats who followed the Pied Piper's
piping to the river where they drowned. Not that I consider them to be long-tailed
rodents rather than his sheep.
The only glimmer of hope I saw for possibly avoiding another Mexican
standoff next year would be if Busch followed through on his last minute idea of
pushing for a vote in the House and Ways Committee and on the House floor for
a November referendum that would legalize slots by a constitutional
amendment. But alas, he didn't. Much to my regret and the regret of the majority of
Marylanders who support Ehrlich's plan for authorizing slots at specific
locations, the same as they did last year and in Glendening's second term.
But lets hope he'll bring it up again at, say, a special session or at
the start of the next session, albeit that Ehrlich opposes "passing the ball" to the voters. However, no doubt the biggest obstacle would be in obtaining a "super" majority in both houses to pass such an amendment. Ah, but like they
say, "hope springs eternal," even if it takes an eternity to be fulfilled.